H04050 MAYOR OF CASTERBRIDGE COPYRIGHT QUERY - 8/5/04 - HARDY FORUM ARCHIVES
From: ? hardycor@owl.csusm.edu
Subject: MoC Copyright Query
Date: August 5, 2004 4:08:52 PM PDT
Dear All,
I received this query today, and would be grateful if any member could
enlighten me about the copyright situation. I will forward on any
information coming to the Forum to the inquirer.
Many Thanks,
Betty
Greetings, I'm seeking information relating to any copyright that
might currently be held on the plot in Thomas Hardy's "The Mayor of
Casterbridge". I am in the process of writing a novel set in County
Wexford (Ireland) in the 1830s. Though nothing is lifted verbatim from the
original, it is essentially an "adaptation" of Hardy's classic. Though the
sub-plots differ somewhat and all my characters naturally speak in Wexford
dialect (rather than Dorset), the 'core' plot-line is essentially the same
as the original. My publisher recommended that I investigate whether
there is currently copyright on said plot before I proceed. Thus, I would
be greatly obliged to yourselves for any information you can offer in this
regard. Kind regards, Ronan Scanlan, Dublin, Ireland.
==========
From: segr@segr-music.net
Subject: RE: MoC Copyright Query
Date: August 5, 2004 4:45:53 PM PDT
Betty! What an extraordinary idea.
No suggestions to offer yet except that the Japanese society might have
had a go at producing the Hardy story and would then know
of any legal objections with *international* effect.
It does sound like plagiarism to me, so I think that might be said
on our behalf?
Roy Buckle.
www.segr-music.net
==========
From: goldie.morgentaler@uleth.ca
Subject: Re: MoC Copyright Query
Date: August 6, 2004 7:49:55 AM PDT
Dear All,
I am not a lawyer and so have no expertise on this very interesting
question, but it seems to me that it should not be possible to copyright a
plot. There are only so many plots in the world and if all that is being
taken is the bare-bones plot of M of C, then I don't think this is an
issue of palgiarism. The movie "The Claim" of a few years ago also took
Hardy's plot and adapted it. If all the author is doing is taking the
bones of plot and rewriting the rest then it seems to me that there is no
problem, especially if the work is clearly intended as an adaptation. I
would be very interested in knowing what the law actually says about this..
But it seems to me that copyrighting a plot by itself cannot be done.
Goldie Morgentaler
University of Lethbridge
==========
From: hardycor@owl.csusm.edu
Subject: Mayor Copyright Question
Date: August 6, 2004 9:42:14 AM PDT
Dear All,
Further to my message of yesterday, here is some more information from the
writer who is working on a novel with a plot similar to *The Mayor of
Casterbridge.* I found his rationale fascinating, but I still do not have
a definitive answer to his question. I've also appended my response to his
original query.
Betty
Betty, Your assistance is very much appreciated. I must rent out
that film "The Claim" as it sounds interesting. Hardy wrote The Mayor of
Casterbridge about 130 years ago so it's likely that any plot copyright
has long expired. And as Hardy had no children, it is less likely to have
been renewed than was the case with, say, J.R.R. Tolkien's literature
(renewed by his son in 1990). However, it will be helpful to have it
confirmed before proceeding with publication. It's eerie how much the
Wexford town of Castlebridge has in common with Dorchester
(Casterbridge). It had a thriving barley business before the repeal of the
corn laws and there's even a river nearby called "The Blackwater".
Coincidence or what? So thanks in advance for any info that you'll
forward on. Kind regards, Ronan Scanlan.
----- Original Message ----- From: Betty Cortus To: Ronan
Scanlan Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 12:10 AM Subject: Re:
Copyright on "The Mayor of Casterbridge"
Dear Ronan,
I will pass your query along to the Hardy List, and will forward any
information to you that comes in regarding copyright. Have you perchance
seen the film *The Claim*? It draws from the basic plot of *The Mayor*
but locates the scenario in the western United states during the Gold
Rush days. A discussion of this film on the Hardy Forum several years back
was quite positive, and no mention was made of copyright violation.
Best Wishes,
Betty Cortus
HARDY-L Director
hardycor@owl.csusm.edu
==========
From: sdallas74@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: Mayor Copyright Question
Date: August 6, 2004 10:06:03 AM PDT
Hi all,
I work in copyright and permissions at a publishing house in California and so have some expertise on the matter. Copyright protection expires after 75 years of publication, so Hardy's work is most definitely in the public domain. Facts, ideas, plot lines, etc. are not eligible for copyright protection, so there would be no infringement worries in adapting the MoC plot. In these cases at our publishing house, we make sure the authors of the new work clearly credit somewhere in their publication the original source for the ideas. And as long as the adaptation is truly an adaptation and does not use significant chunks verbatim of original text, a simple credit or acknowledgement line should suffice.
Thanks,
Sarah Harkrader
From: Betty Cortus <hardycor@owl.csusm.edu>
Reply-To: HARDY-L@csusm.edu
To: HARDY-L <HARDY-L@csusm.edu>
Subject: Mayor Copyright Question
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 09:42:14 -0700
Dear All,
Further to my message of yesterday, here is some more information from the
writer who is working on a novel with a plot similar to *The Mayor of
Casterbridge.* I found his rationale fascinating, but I still do not have
a definitive answer to his question. I've also appended my response to his
original query.
Betty
Betty, Your assistance is very much appreciated. I must rent out
that film "The Claim" as it sounds interesting. Hardy wrote The Mayor of
Casterbridge about 130 years ago so it's likely that any plot copyright
has long expired. And as Hardy had no children, it is less likely to have
been renewed than was the case with, say, J.R.R. Tolkien's literature
(renewed by his son in 1990). However, it will be helpful to have it
confirmed before proceeding with publication. It's eerie how much the
Wexford town of Castlebridge has in common with Dorchester
(Casterbridge). It had a thriving barley business before the repeal of the
corn laws and there's even a river nearby called "The Blackwater".
Coincidence or what? So thanks in advance for any info that you'll
forward on. Kind regards, Ronan Scanlan.
==========
From: Jcphardysoc@aol.com
Subject: Re: Mayor Query
Date: August 6, 2004 3:42:08 PM PDT
I believe that under European Community law (which would apply to the Irish Republic), copyright exists for 70 years after an author's death, or 70 years after publication for works published posthumously such as most of Hardy's letters.
John Pentney
==========
From: Charles.Anesi@wellsfargo.com
Subject: RE: Mayor Query
Date: August 6, 2004 4:33:13 PM PDT
U.S. Copyright law was amended in 1998, extending the term of copyright by 20 years. Currently it is for the life of the offer plus 70 years, and for works done for hire 95 years from first publication or 120 from creation, whichever comes first. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonny_Bono_Copyright_Term_Extension_Act for further discussion. The extension was (in truth) passed to protect Disney characters from entering the public domain, and thus the act is commonly known as the "Mickey Mouse Act". The Supreme Court upheld this against constitutional challenge on 1/15/2003. The U.S. Constitution Art. I sec.8 provides that Congress may ""promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries." Question was what constitutes a "limited time". Dicta indicates that further extensions will probably not be tolerated. The Act did NOT revive copyrights that had already expired.
U.S. infringement test is "substantial similarity" which requires a bit of reading to grasp. There is an interesting contrast to patent law. Under patent law, independent creation is no defense to a patent infringement claim (though it might have some weight in showing the discovery to be obvious to a person skilled in the art and thus not patentable). But independent creation is an absolute defense to a copyright infringement claim. Of course, if the similarity is striking, you might have trouble with such a defense. An interesting case of this sort occurred with a French novel that had striking similarities to H. Rider Haggard's *She*. Infringement action failed when it was clearly shown that the French author had no knowledge of Haggard's work.
I am a lawyer but not a copyright lawyer, so I can't answer arcane questions about this, and do not rely on anything whatsoever that I have said in this email.
Chuck Anesi
Charles.Anesi@wellsfargo.com
office 612-667-9518
cell 612-940-3345
==========
From: patmann@ouvip.com
Subject: Re: Mayor Query
Date: August 6, 2004 11:43:30 PM PDT
I can second this. It used to be 50 years after an author's death until approximately 5-6 years ago. I looked into it before the two Hardy sequels I'd written were published.
Patricia Dolling-Mann
From: Jcphardysoc@aol.com
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 11:42 PM
Subject: Re: Mayor Query
I believe that under European Community law (which would apply to the Irish Republic), copyright exists for 70 years after an author's death, or 70 years after publication for works published posthumously such as most of Hardy's letters.
John Pentney
==========
From: hardycor@owl.csusm.edu
Subject: More on Mayor Adaptation
Date: August 7, 2004 6:42:59 AM PDT
Dear All,
Thanks once again to all who offered information on the copyright question.
I thought you might be intrigued to learn of some more parallels between
Hardy's novel and the one Ronan Scanlan has written, or at least the
settings of the two. I'm copying his most recent message below.
Betty
Betty, Those responses are extremely helpful. And thanks for your
interest in my adaptation. Unfortunately, an internet search on the string
"Mayor of Castlebridge" already delivers hits, but this is wholly due to a
lack of attention to detail in spelling the correct name of the Hardy
original! To the best of my knowledge, there is as yet no novel titled "The
Mayor of Castlebridge" (well, until next year D.V.). And just for your
interest, here's more coincidences for you. Trivial but interesting...
1. Wexford has a village called 'Kilmuckridge' (lit. Church of
'Muckridge'). Hardy has a character 'Nance Mockridge'. 2. Four common
Wexford surnames are Hendrick, Bulger, Stafford and Wickham. Hardy has a
Henchard, Bulge, Stannidge & Whittle. 3. Castlebridge had a "Codd's
Walk" and a "Dixon Lane". Hardy mentions a "Chalk Walk" and a "Mixen
Lane". 4. Castlebridge is about 4 miles from the Wexford
coast, Dorchester a like distance from the Wessex coast. 5. Wexford has
a Wellingtonbridge. Hardy's Wessex has a Wellbridge. 6. Broadwey is
close to Weymouth harbour, Broadway close to Rosslare Harbour. It's
crazy!!! Regards, Ronan.
==========
From: Jcphardysoc@aol.com
Subject: Re: Mayor Query
Date: August 8, 2004 3:01:15 PM PDT
The result of extending copyright from 50 years (strictly 50 years from the end of the year in which the author died) to 70 years was to bring Hardy's writings back into copyright again for a few years, after they had come into the public domain on 1 January 1979.. The 70 year period has now expired of course for Hardy.
John Pentney
==========
From: hardycor@owl.csusm.edu
Subject: More on Copyright
Date: August 14, 2004 9:42:31 AM PDT
Dear All,
Ronan Scanlan who is writing a novel based loosely on the plot of *The
Mayor of Casterbridge* has asked me to thank all who gave information
about the copyright situation in Europe and the US. However, he now would
like to know if different rules apply in Canada. I will forward any
information on to him.
Many Thanks,
Betty Cortus
==========