HARDY FORUM ARCHIVE H01013 1/30/01 "CRITICS ON THE QUEENS OF CORNWALL QUESTION" =================================================================== From: "Patrick Roper" Subject: Queen of Cornwall commentary Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 17:47:43 -0000 I would be very grateful if subcribers could recommend any critical commentaries or analysis of TH's play 'The Tragedy of the Famous Queen of Cornwall'. I have, in the past few weeks, read it twice and am trying to work out how it stands in relation to the rest of Hardy's life and work. Many of the books on the author either ignore it altogether or seem to comment in a rather matter-of-fact way on when it was written and performed, but not what Hardy might have been trying to achieve. I suppose what puzzles me most is the kind of audience (or performers) it was intended for. Hardy calls it a play for mummers, but it seems unlikely to me that the kind of mummers he describes so wonderfully in Return of the Native would make much of it. I also gather he started thinking about it in the 1870s, he says he started writing it in 1916, then put it aside and finished and published it in 1923 when he was, of course, 83. Why? I won't go on as I am sure there have been many scholarly elaborations and I ought to read those first! Patrick Roper =========== From: "Ahmad" Subject: Re: Queen of Cornwall commentary Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 18:30:51 +0200 Patrick, There is an interesting biographical interpretation of the play in Kenneth Phelps's book * The Wormwood Cup: Thomas Hardy in Cornwall * (Padstow, Cornwall: Lodenek Press, 1975), 99-114. A shorter (and more balanced) comment is given by Professor Harold Orel in his chapter on "Hardy and the Theatre" in * The Genius of Thomas Hardy *, ed. Margaret Drabble (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1976), 94-108. Cheers! Suleiman M. Ahmad University of Damascus =========== From: "Patrick Roper" Subject: RE: Queen of Cornwall commentary Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 17:48:06 -0000 Status: Thanks for this. I have a copy of The Wormwood Cup and, although the author is quite interesting on some of the factual background, he doesn't dig very deep into the creative and other mental processes that might have underlain Hardy's 'Queen'. I have not read Harold Orel's essay, but will certainly have a look at this now you have suggested it. Patrick ==========